Login
Region: Europe
-
Virtual General Members’ Meeting – Vote on Articles
For Members-Only – We are holding a General Members’ meeting to approve the proposed new Articles of Association
-
Virtual Q&A: New Articles – Tuesday 22nd October 2024
For Members-Only – We will be holding virtual Q&A sessions to answer any questions members have regarding the new Articles being proposed.
-
Virtual Q&A: New Articles – Thursday 24th October 2024
For Members-Only – We will be holding two virtual Q&A sessions to answer any questions members may have regarding the new Articles being proposed.
-
Balancing Legal Priorities: Navigating ESG Risks While Driving Impact
This event explored the key role of legal professionals in shaping ESG strategies. This thought-provoking session examined whether lawyers can effectively balance their duties as risk managers with their potential as leaders in impact-driven initiatives. From addressing complex issues like artisanal mining and evolving supply chain models, to navigating the risks of potential disputes, this…
-
Bridging Investment Readiness with Impact: Knowledge Exchange between Asia and Europe
This event will explore the evolving focus on impact investment readiness, highlighting the difference between traditional investment readiness and impact-driven strategies going beyond ESG risks.
-
Rules of the Game for Sustainable Business: Laws, Contracts and Morality
David Frydlinger, a Swedish attorney and GAIL member, has written a unique book on EU sustainability law and sustainable business. “Rules of the Game for Sustainable Business: Laws, Contracts and Morality” is a crucially important book for all impact lawyers. The book explains the changing landscape and provides a guide for companies on how to transform…
-
Assessing the influence of ESG washing on bank reputational exposure: A cross-country analysis
This article investigates the critical impact of ESG washing on banks’ reputations in this insightful study. Exploring data from 120 banks across 35 countries between 2014 and 2020, the research reveals how discrepancies between environmental and social disclosures and their actual implementation can either heighten or reduce reputational risks.
